Tue 1 Jun 2004
Wendy Shalit ‘97 is quoted in yesterday’s New York Times Magazine article on “Friends, Friends With Benefits and the Benefits of the Local Mall.”
Wendy Shalit, whose book, ”A Return to Modesty,” embodies what has been termed ”the new chastity,” also says she believes that girls are being manipulated, but by a society that tries to convince them that they should act like boys, turning sexual modesty into a sign of weakness or repression — something young women are taught to be embarrassed about. ”In the age of the hookup,” Shalit writes, ”young women confess their romantic hopes in hushed tones, as if harboring some terrible secret.”
Shalit was one of the most famous undergrads on campus during her time at Williams because of an article that she wrote about co-ed bathrooms in Commentary. Although that article does not appear to be on-line, interested readers can look here for an example of Shalit’s writing.
I first became interested in the subject of modesty for a rather mundane reason — because I didn’t like the bathrooms at Williams College. Like many enlightened colleges and universities these days, Williams houses boys next to girls in its dormitories and then has the students vote by floor on whether their common bathrooms should be coed. It’s all very democratic, but the votes always seem to go in the coed direction because no one wants to be thought a prude. When I objected, I was told by my fellow students that I “must not be comfortable with [my] body.” Frankly, I didn’t get that, because I was fine with my body; it was their bodies in such close proximity to mine that I wasn’t thrilled about.
How is the co-ededness of bathrooms decided in First Year entries nowadays? I would think that a private vote by mail over the summer would make for a better proceedure that a public vote during First Days.
4 Responses to “ A Modest Eph ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Modest and Immodest Ephs » EphBlog
September 23rd, 2008 at 1:23 pm[...] Own”, one of the most controversial articles about Williams in the last decade. (Note our previous discussion of Shalit’s work, especially the last comment by Eric Smith ‘99. If anyone could send in a copy of that [...]


June 1st, 2004 at 7:34 pm
Yeah, as another class of 97er, I can say that Wendy was pretty out there. I tried to engage her in discussion on several occasions (and I am a moderate who recognizes that Williams is not always terribly hospitable to conservative views, so I made an extra effort to listen to her viewpoint) but basically all she was able to do was quote from theorists she had read, she was completely unable or unwilling to actually defend a position or confront a contrary view. She read so much into the bathroom controversy that just, simply, wasn’t at issue: in my entry, and I’m guessing in others as well, the coed bathrooms was not the result of any liberal agenda, but rather the laziness of college students who had no desire to travel and extra 20 feet to you a single-sex bathroom.
But, on another note, the New York Times Mag. article is interesting and worth a read.
June 1st, 2004 at 9:01 pm
Can someone elaborate further on what this bathroom thing is? It sounds pretty interesting, but all I’m picking up on are little bits and pieces of the story.
In my entry there was no vote for bathrooms–you shared a bathroom with the people you shared a bathroom with (verticle entries). As it turned out, 90% of the time you shared a bathroom with someone of the same gender. I know a couple of people in willy who have co-ed bathroom but I’d guess that there are probably no more than 3-4 co-ed bathrooms in the entire dorm.
June 2nd, 2004 at 6:44 am
In both my entry as a frosh and while as a JA, we did the bathroom thing the true Williams way. That’s right, we removed the shower curtain and bathroom stall doors.
Someone was designated to enforce the mandatory nudity policy and we were also encouraged to “go in the sink” if at all possible. This person would preside over their domain with a harsh and grating tone, but casting no doubt to the supreme correctness of any and all decisions made.
Quite frankly, I think the Williams way is the only way. Anything else would be uncivilized.