Sat 25 Feb 2006
Great on-line article in Sports Illustrated written by one Eph alum about another:
DK’s favorite topic, Eph marriage, even gets a mention!
Unlike many on this forum, I relish Williams’ image as a Division III athletic power. I sort of like the idea of Williams as a place where academics are top-notch, but where leadership/service/social development, athletics/outdoors activities, and excellence in the arts are all valued in equal measure. I’ll admit that right now, athletics may be a little bit TOO prominent in this equation, and I hope that the new arts facilities will be accompanied by a corresponding increased emphasis on students with artistic talent. But I don’t think the formula on campus, with the new restrictions on low-band admits, is that far off. Eliminate some of the admits in just a few problem sports, whose members are disproportiantely responsible for the bad image of athletics on campus, and I think Williams could achieve the proper balance. But the school certainly gets a lot of great publicity from its overall excellence in athletics, and attracts a lot of applicants who appreciate being in an academic environment where many students maintain an intense focus, and attain great success, in other arenas.
On another athletic topic which perhaps deserves its own post at some point, it’s kind of amazing, given Williams’ reputation for athletic excellence, that the only campus facilities to receive little attention in recent years are some of the badly-outdated athletic facilities. The Williams track facilities are apparently in terrible disrepair, and except for Chandler and the new squash courts, the remainder of the indoor athletic facilities are reaching the end of their usefulness. In particular, the weight room/fitness center, which is utilized by a huge percentage of campus, is (last I saw) far, far inferior to similar facilities at Williams’ prime competitors. Middlebury and Amherst, to name two, both have huge, gorgeous fitness centers, which make the Williams’ facility look like a high school junior varsity weight room by comparison. Given the enormous capital investment in a professional-caliber theater and art studio, two new student centers, and a new academic quad, I’m surprised a relatively modest sum has not been set aside to renovate and expand the cramped, overused fitness center and improve the condition of the fieldhouse and outdoor track. I imagine some creative reengineering of Lasell could find room for an expanded fitness center without anywhere near the costs of the other major campus projects. Otherwise, Williams may soon begin to lose talented student-athletes to Midd and Amherst despite its reputation for athletic excellence.
February 25th, 2006 at 10:20 am
The athletic facilities are pretty sad. If you want to know just how bad the situation is for the track team, please take a lok at Dan Austin’s article in the record @ http://www.williamsrecord.com/wr/?section=opinion&view=article&id=7558
And its true- most high school weight rooms are nicer than ours. Why do we not have a top of the line facility? This goes along with being a top-notch institution AND being an athletics power.
February 25th, 2006 at 10:27 am
Williams has been looking for a while to remodel the athletic facilities. The problem is space–there is no space to build new athletic facilities, so when they’re done they will have to be built over the existing facilities. As Williams has committed to maintaining a certain amount of green space on campus, they won’t be able to redo the athletic facilities until the library/student center are done. However, I believe they’re the next thing slated after the library, so we can expect a new athletic complex in 2016 or so.
Speaking of Williams athletics, I just watching Chip Knight (a current student) in the Olympics. He’s not a favor and probably not in medal contention but he definitely just finished a run that should make all Ephs proud. He was in 14th place last I saw. To give that some perspective, I think he’s currently the highest-ranked American.
February 25th, 2006 at 11:57 am
eph09 writes:
frank uible, where are you when we need you to jump in with some class-hierarchy commentary?
Most high schools don’t have weight rooms. I have heard that many high schools on the west coast do, but you would be hard pressed to find a public high school just about anywhere you look that has a weight room. The high schools that do have them are going to be very wealthy high schools, either private schools in rich areas or private schools. So while Williams’ weight room may be worse than the average high school weight room, the average high school does not have a weight room.
Where did you go, eph09, private school?
February 25th, 2006 at 12:05 pm
Diana–
Actually, I’m not sure if you’re right there. My high school was very poor, very rural, and very public…and we had a weightroom (which was probably pretty similar to Williams’). Then again, football was a huge deal at my high school and we also had a nicer football stadium than Williams–so that might have something to do with it–but I’d be surprised if most public high schools didn’t have weight rooms.
February 25th, 2006 at 12:47 pm
Williams’ weight room is fine. To weight train all one needs is weights and will. Williams has a lot of weights; the students need to provide the will; additionally Williams has weight machines which are marginally desirable but an unnecessary luxury. As for the weight room being overcrowded, in the last 5 years I have made scores of visits to it at various times in the mornings and early afternoons, and never - I repeat, never - during those times has the room been crowded. If perchance it should be crowded in the late afternoon, then one can shift one’s conditioning to other times. After all on most days it is open from early morning through early evening. One does not have to weight train with the crowd; weight training is not a social event. If done correctly weight training ought to be hard work - like digging ditches. Finally I can’t imagine a student, who has been accepted to Williams, eschewing Williams for the superficial reason that its weight room is somehow lacking. Diana, is that enough rant for the day?
February 25th, 2006 at 1:09 pm
The weight room is fine, its crowded sometimes but adequate. What is really lacking is a cardio room. The treadmills and bikes up by the squash courts are always packed.
I remember a few years ago hearing about the college trying to build a whole new fieldhouse down at weston field, where that horrible restroom shack is. It was going to have additional training area for the track team along with some locker rooms for teams using the turf field and for gamedays for football, along with some decent restroom facilities. What I heard at the time was that Stienbrenner had been approached about funding the project. I have heard differing reports over why it never happened, from Steinbrenner walking out of the meeting because Williams was unprepared, to the college not wanting to give Steinbrenner naming rights. Has anyone else heard anything about this?
February 25th, 2006 at 2:27 pm
What is wrong with the restroom shack; I love peeing where James A. Garfield did!
February 25th, 2006 at 2:32 pm
Knight got his top 20 finish in the Slalom!
February 25th, 2006 at 10:53 pm
Or heck, if the restroom shack isn’t sufficient, the Record indicates that just doing your business on the carpet of a common room or a window ledge in Gladden House is an option for today’s Ephmen, too.
February 26th, 2006 at 3:44 pm
from what i understand, steinbrenner had agreed to finance a new fieldhouse and a new track (to replace the current surface) but that he wanted the naming rights and the college did not want there to be a “steinbrenner” fieldhouse
February 26th, 2006 at 5:10 pm
There must be some Red Sox fans on the Board of Trustees.