Wed 19 Dec 2007
Story of My Baby
Posted by David under Jay McInerney '76 at 6:12 am
Was it just two months ago that I brought the name Rielle Hunter to your attention, dear readers? Indeed, it was. Hope you were paying attention! Now the ex-girlfriend of Jay McInerney ’76, and inspiration for his book, Story of My Life, is accused by being pregnant with presidential candidate John Edwards’ love child.
Time for McInerney to write the sequel . . .
Print • Email| « The Eph Who Changed the World of Oil | Almost Mugged » |
14 Responses to “Story of My Baby”
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Trash » EphBlog
August 1st, 2008 at 8:17 am
[...] ‘76 former girlfriend Rielle Hunter was in the news? Was it just 7 months ago that I passed on the story of Hunter’s love child with with former Democratic Senator and presidential [...]
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post
If a comment you submitted does not show up, please email us at eph at ephblog dot com. Please note that commenters are required to use a valid email address when submitting comments.
Jeff Z. says:
No need to do Drudge’s dirty work for him, David. That story has already been pulled from the site after the woman apparently denied that the baby was Edwards’.
I am now going to find some tangential Eph connection to Rudy Giulianni, so I can post about him marrying his second cousin and cheating on his second wife with Judith Nathan.
David says:
Please tell me that an Judy Nathan’s boyfriend pre-Rudy was an Eph, and that he wrote a best-selling book with a main character inspired by her. That would be most excellent.
By the way, you are obviously confusing me with someone who is pro-Giuliani . . .
frank uible says:
Sad to say that the history of our leaders’ arrogant comportment tends to give such rumor mongering a certain currency, despite denials. I have gotten over Dr. Krissoff’s recent action and now have resubmitted my application for withdrawal from the human race.
JQP says:
Edwards is the only Democratic candidate that (currently) consistently beats each of the four leading Republican candidates in a national pole. In 2000, Bush slimed McCain in S.C. with two fraudulent charges that gave Bush the edge and saved his candidacy; McCain’s black love child, McCain mental unstability from being tortured. What schadenfreude if this very same meme is what propels Edqwards against in a national race. R*t-f*cking is alive and well in the RNC.
frank uible says:
The Republicans do not have a monopoly on dishonesty and corruption.
FROSH mom says:
I heard it was only corruption they have a monopoly on.
Dishonesty is till available for all.
On a positive note, I really like McInerney’s wine column. He has a fresh and unique voice in that regard.
FROSH mom says:
Grammar check: (because Jay might see this)
I heard it was only corruption on which they have a monopoly.
(No, no, that can’t be right because they have a monopoly on many other things.)
How about:
Of the two, I heard it was only corruption on which they have a monopoly.
Which is the best way to say it?
Jay?
frank uible says:
As I said it!
Anonymous says:
While you are all at it, Hillary Clinton, nee Rodham, while at Wellesley, wrote her term paper on Saul Alinsky. Wellesley administrative officials will not release this to the public.
While at Yale she was known as “Fridgidaire”.
Do we really care today?
Huckabee claimed to have a degree in ministry, yet he now denies it.
How are we to reconcile any assessment of a candidates’ merit to office?
Does character account for anything?
Since the general public already accepts the notion that politicians lie, then do prognostications on policy and programs concerning their future commitments before the public have any currency within the electorate?
Human beings are complex biological entities and as such how are we to view them?
Most of our candidates are proxies for the position of the “Barker” in a circus tent. The “pitchman” for special interests. It is all going to depend upon who you are emotionally and tangentially attracted to anyway.
Look at it this way, how many of you would have dated your significant other if they told you the truth?
& says:
David -
This is trash. The story never had a leg to stand on. Why do you keep trying to keep it alive?
Report on Jay’s books and what Jay’s up to, if you want, but acknowledge that this story doesn’t have even a whiff of truth. Then please move on and don’t mention it again.
& says:
David -
This is trash. The story never had a leg to stand on. Why do you keep trying to keep it alive?
Report on Jay’s books and what Jay’s up to, if you want, but acknowledge that this story doesn’t have even a whiff of truth. Then please move on and don’t mention it again.
frank uible says:
You wouldn’t want David to cut short his career as the Walter Winchell of Ephdom, would you?
Andrew says:
David,
Ephs everywhere thank you for making EphBlog part of a shameless home-stretch smear attempt against the Edwards campaign.