Currently browsing the archives for February 2008
1988 Yearbook: Page 66
Click below for full image:
Read more
Tips Revisited
This Chronicle of Education article from 6 years ago allows us to review the history of “tips” — significant admissions preferences for athletic excellence — and speculate on the future. Previous discussion here. Join us below.
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 65
Click below for full image:
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 64
Click below for full image:
Read more
Exploratory Committee for Community Ethics
First off, I hope that you alumni had a chance to read what your executive committee placed as a full page ad in the Record this week. Credit also to Neil for catching the titles error in the 17th comment.
The Stand With Us Social Honor Code group is proposing:
A committee called the “Exploratory Committee on Community Ethics” (ECCE) of 15 voting members: 9 students, one of whom is Chair, three faculty representatives, determined informally in consultation with Wendy Raymond, and 3 staff: the Chaplain to the College, the Vice President for Strategic Planning and Institutional Diversity, and a representative from the Dean’s Office, to be named by the Dean of the College.
Current slate of goals in the link.
Read more
EphsChoose Again
Some kooky alum has an op-ed in the Record on EphsChoose. Other discussion here. Even though I think that this is a great idea, my prediction is that nothing meaningful will come of it because Williams administrators will be able to cajole/trick the interested students into dropping the project. The College is happy to have students fund-raise for projects that the College already approves of. It will do everything it can to prevent students from contacting alumni about projects it would not otherwise fund.
With luck, students will prove me wrong.
Necessary Disciplinary Actions
The student who started the WSO thread (mentioned here) now wants the University of Colorado to punish the offensive student.
From: Sarah.S.Lee@williams.edu [mailto:Sarah.S.Lee@williams.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:52 PM
To: G.P. “Bud” Peterson
Subject: Response to Racist ArticleDear Chancellor Peterson,
My name is Sarah Lee and I am currently a sophomore at Williams College in Williamstown, MA. On February 21, a friend sent me an email with the article “If it’s war the Asians want… It’s war they’ll get” by Max Karson. Although I believe that free speech is a vital foundation of our country, I was appalled that a school publication would publish an article so racist, offensive, and disgusting.
As a Korean American, I have always been the victim of stereotypes and I felt that this article presumed many harmful stereotypes that I am working to fight against. I am the co-chair of the Korean students organization on campus, and sent the article to the Korean club and Asian American students organization. I received many hurt responses, confused why this article would be printed and asking for some type of explanation. I also initiated a discussion on the Williams College student website, and received a varied response:
http://wso.williams.edu/discuss/comments.php? DiscussionID=1324&page=1#Item_0.
I urge you, as chancellor, to take necessary disciplinary actions so that students all over the country will understand that with free speech comes a lot of responsibility.
Thank you so much for your time.
Sincerely,
Sarah Lee
Nice. This is the most Orwellian formulation that I have seen from a Williams student this year. If you really believe that Karson is engaged in “free speech,” then, by definition there must be no official punishment by the state. That’s what free speech means. CU is a public university so there is no way that it can punish students for speech. Does Lee not understand this? She might as well demand that CU send Karson on a trip to Mars.
The chancellor’s statement makes that fairly clear, while kowtowing [Another racial slur! -- ed.] to prevailing sensibilities a bit too much for my taste.
All this matters because Lee is, I assume, a member with Stand With Us. Certainly, there will be many Ephs who think that the proposed Social Honor Code would ban speech like Karson’s. It can’t and it won’t. And the sooner someone takes the time to explain all this to Lee, the better. Again, the best way to make progress on this topic is to look at specific cases, both real and hypothetical.
There is a segment of the community of Ephs, including students, faculty and staff, which thinks that restricting free spech is possible and desirable. Censorship is neither. The sooner we settle on that, the more likely we are to accomplish something useful.
1988 Yearbook: Page 63
Click below for full image:
Read more
Boy, how did we miss this?
Has it been almost 6 weeks since the last update about Ephblog’s favorite CNBC anchor and the Keely Smith to Jim Cramer’s Louis Prima (how does that grab you, jazz lovers?), Erin Burnett? I only mention this because Dealbreaker had linked to a video of EB98 riding around on a hobby horse during a CNBC segment, only to have that video taken down by the no fun editors there. I hoped to find said clip on YouTube, but found this instead. Before watching this, just remember that most Ephwomen are more like our awesome CRASH-B champ, Diana Davis ‘07 (most Ephs know this, but there could some impressionable high school seniors reading this blog, so better safe than sorry). Sing to us, O muse, about recessions.
[display_podcast]
1988 Yearbook: Page 62
Click below for full image:
Read more
Representing Williams at CRASH-B
This past weekend, I went to BU for the CRASH-B World Indoor Rowing Championships. To the best of my knowledge, I was the only Williams alum there — at least, the only person who listed Williams as their affiliation.* And I represented Williams well, because I won (results):
I had gone to CRASH-B with the Williams crew team four years ago, and did not get in the top three, and these four years I have always wanted to go back and see if I could win the hammer — the prize for first place (in addition to a gold medal). And I did! I won the women’s coxswain division, which is basically a 120-pound weight class where you must be primarily a coxswain (not a rower). So I got the hammer. And the great Williams rowing tradition lives on.
* Current Williams athletes can’t put Williams as their affiliation because then it uses up a race, or messes up eligibility, or something. A few current Williams students from the men’s crew team went this year, and listed their affiliation as the “Green Team” (search in open men and LW men); four years ago, we called ourselves “Team Fuego.”
This Is My Gift
The mens basketball team was embarrassed in the first round of the NESCAC tournament, losing to Middlebury by 37 (!) points. Even worse, star guard Chris Shalvoy ‘08 is graduating. Recall Dave Fehr’s fears about the future of Eph hoops and the “Nesbitt Net.”
The Ephs, meanwhile, started 12-0 but are finding it difficult to win in their league and have dropped a total of five games at this writing, including two to Amherst.
So, of course, I’m convinced the sky is falling and I’ll never again see these two teams competitive, much less Williams competitive on a national level. The only flaw in this analysis is that I felt the same way a decade ago and was happily proved wrong. When the Mike Nogelo Final Four teams of ‘97 and ‘98 graduated, I figured that was it for Williams and any further NCAA hoops glory. A short five years later, the Ephs were national champs, and they almost repeated in 2004.
One thing has changed, however, as back then there was no Nesbitt Net, which is director of Admissions Dick Nesbitt’s and President Morty Schapiro’s increasingly fine-meshed screen that weeds out applicants, including star athletes, with “low” board scores.
What should Coach Dave Paulsen do? Come up with better plays? Presumably, he is as good a coach as he was five years ago when he guided the Ephs to a national championship. Paulsen knows that “players win games, not plays.” Sounds like he needs some better players . . .
Time call the Admissions Office! We need a star guard. And, good news! Help is on the way.
Lick-Wilmerding boys basketball coach Eliot Smith is trying to enjoy every moment. At some point in the next few weeks, four-year varsity point guard Marcus Wells will play his last game for the San Francisco school.
“My wife told me, ‘You only have a few more weeks and then it goes back to normal,’ ” Smith said after a recent game.
Playing in the anonymity of the Bay Counties League West, Wells is the best player you don’t know about – and he’s fine with that.“He was the best player on the team when he was a freshman, but I didn’t start him because the other kids would have hated him,” said Smith, whose team is 21-7 and will host St. Bernard’s-Eureka on Wednesday. “Once I saw how he handled it, I knew I had someone special.”
…
Wells drew attention from some Division I programs, but opted for a similar environment to his high school – albeit across the country.
He will attend Williams College in Massachusetts, a 2,000-student school that won the Division III national championship in 2003 and is regarded as the No. 1 liberal-arts college in the country, according to U.S. News and World Report.
“I really knew I needed to get a good education,” said Wells, whose father, Marcus Wells Sr., was an All-City defensive back on Lincoln’s 1979 Turkey Day championship team.
As much as Smith gushes about Wells’ physical ability, calling him one of the best he has had in 33 years, the coach continually talks about Wells’ character and the way he treats his teammates.
“We’ve been really lucky,” Smith said.
“I think it goes back to his parents. I think they taught him to believe, ‘This is my gift and the players around me have their gifts.’ “
Good stuff. Williams has a long tradition of excellent point guards going back from Shalvoy ‘08 to Crotty ‘04 to Nogelo ‘98 to Harry Sheehy ‘75. Wasn’t Peter Willmott ‘59, former chair of the executive committee of trustees, a guard and captain of the basketball team back in the day? Surely some of our older readers can tell some Al Shaw stories . . .
Anyway, Wells knows how to play.
For my money, Marcus wells is the most talented point guard in the city. He has more of an all around game than any other and would have been a clear d-1 choice if he’d gone to a school where sports is more of a focus than the academics (e.g., the WCAL). Avg 20 pts, 6 assts, and 7 rbs per game is impressive by any calculation. He may be going d-3 but he’s going to one of the best colleges in the country, that’s equally impressive since he had to qualify with his game and his grades both.
Indeed. Welcome to Williams.
1988 Yearbook: Page 61
Click below for full image:
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 60
Click below for full image. Note how Jim Duquette ‘88 started out his career in sports management by working with the women’s basketball team. There is a lesson there for younger Ephs who want to become professional general managers some day . . . Read more
Ask The Trustees
Wick Sloane ‘76 writes:
Having trouble finding out who decides what percentage of the student body at any given university should be on scholarship? Or how many students will have Pell Grants? Or that tuition will rise, again? Who decides, as Williams College just did, to tear down a sound student center and to build another, with tax-deducted dollars, while raising tuition? Well, how about asking the trustees who decides?
Good stuff. I rarely bother the trustees or Morty because they are busy people with better things to do than consider my opinions. But, Record reporters have a right and obligation to bother them all the time. Although the Trustees delegate most decisions to the Administration, they are involved in all the large issues. A good example was the move to a no loans financial aid policy while simultaneously refusing to meet the generosity of competitor schools like Harvard and Princeton. Consider some comments on WSO:
Wait, so a Harvard family making $120k/yr only has to to pay $12k? That’s incredibly generous. I know a lot of kids here at Williams whose families make substantially less than that and yet still pay the full $45k or very close to it.
my brother went to dartmouth & they offered him a significantly better aid package than i receive.
i think i get a real shitty deal here compared to what harvard aid offers – - who else feels the same? this is a serious matter – if we want boyer and morty to offer a better deal to middle class families, we have to demand it!
Indeed. The Record ought to do a multiple article story on financial aid at Williams. Who gets how much and why? Do most applicants admitted to Williams get better deals from places like Harvard? And, once the Record has the facts, it ought to ask the Trustees why the policy is what it is.
1988 Yearbook: Page 59
Click below for full image. It shows the 1987-1988 mens basketball team. Comments:
1) Note Dave Clawson ‘89, now football offensive coordinator for the Tennessee after a series of head coaching jobs. Baring a major screw up, you can be sure that Clawson will get a shot at leading a Division I program in the next few years.
2) Former mens coach Harry Sheehy ‘75 somehow made do with just one assistant coach. Current mens coach Dave Paulsen ‘87 needs two. No wonder tuition keeps going up!
Read more
Anti-Boob
Some readers are quick to claim that my relish in anticipating PC Buffoonery in the context of Stand With Us is unseemly. Perhaps! But PC Buffoonery there will certainly be. Consider Anna Weber’s story:
So there’s this cartoon/letter-sized printout that’s posted in the computer lab of Clark Hall, along with a bunch of other geology jokes. The cartoon features a nerdy-looking guy flanked by some swankily dressed women, and they’re walking down the sidewalk. A policeman/bodyguard type is pushing a passerby off the sidewalk and saying “Get out of the way, you swine! A geologist is coming!” In the background, a nicely dressed lady with big hair is looking at the geologist and little hearts are all around her.
Not the funniest or even the most tasteful cartoon in the world, but, hey, we kinda like it. It’s been in Clarklab practically since the Mesozoic. But sometime between Saturday afternoon and Monday morning someone took a marker and wrote in big letters on the cartoon: “exploitative! Are women with boobs status symbols? Accessories? EFF THIS!” They circled said boobs and also wrote “BUTT” on a second, totally unrelated poster.
No way is this an extreme case of vandalism, by any stretch of the imagination. But, still. Come on, people. First of all, if you don’t like our jokes, don’t come to our lab. There are plenty of other places to hang out on a Saturday night. And Clarklab may be a public space, but I would argue that the bulletin boards belong to the department. (So does the food–for example, the loaf of sandwich bread that was stolen from my shelf a few weeks ago–but that’s a different story!) Second of all, this isn’t one of those Danish cartoons. I mean, the department is full of high-achieving female students and professors (and I’m pretty sure we’ve all got boobs) and we’re not accessories and no one has ever said anything about it before.
Anyway. Of course this isn’t really about our geology cartoon.
The student body is apparently making big strides against “discrimination of every kind”–so bully for us. But I feel like there is no reason to go into someone else’s space and seek out “discrimination.” Even if you do, there’s really no reason to deface something that belongs to someone else and that could maybe, out of context, be construed as inflammatory. Or is that [insert sarcasm here] just a couple of really un-PC assumptions on my part?
1) Why the sarcasm? This is how PC works. Someone — perhaps a prankster, more likely a supporter of Stand With Us — finds your cartoon offensive. For starters, they deface it. They expect you to understand their displeasure. They expect you to respect their feelings. They want you to remove it and, better yet, apologize. Don’t believe me? Ask professors like Wendy Raymond and Dorothy Wang. Professor Wang says:
“The rally was great, but we need to move beyond the symbolic to concrete institutional changes to make a permanently better situation for minorities at Williams,” she said. “Students graduate after four years, but these things have been happening for Williams for decades.”
Think that Professor Wang believes that individual students and professors in Geology should be able to hang up whatever sorts of cartoons they like? Even cartoons that someone else finds offensive? Ask her. After all, cartoons that some people find offensive (and others find funny) have been hung up around Williams “for decades.”
2) See Wikipedia for an explanation of Weber’s reference to “Danish cartoons.” One of those cartoons is pictured to the right. The artist responsible has been in the news recently.
On February 12, 2008, Danish police arrested three men (two Tunisians and one Danish national originally from Morocco) suspected of planning to assassinate Kurt Westergaard, the cartoonist who drew the Bomb in the Turban cartoon. Westergaard has since been under police protection. He said he is angry that a “perfectly normal everyday activity [drawing political cartoons] which I used to do by the thousand was abused to set off such madness.”
It is not clear why Weber thinks that Westergaard’s cartoon is more offensive than the one she describes. Isn’t offensiveness in the eye of the beholder? Recall what William Bennett ‘65 wrote two years ago about the US media’s refusal to reprint the cartoons.
But for the past month, the Islamist street has been on an intifada over cartoons depicting Muhammad that were first published months ago in a Danish newspaper. Protests in London — never mind Jordan, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Iran and other countries not noted for their commitment to democratic principles — included signs that read, “Behead those who insult Islam.” The mainstream U.S. media have covered this worldwide uprising; it is, after all, a glimpse into the sentiments of our enemy and its allies. And yet it has refused, with but a few exceptions, to show the cartoons that purportedly caused all the outrage.
…
What has happened? To put it simply, radical Islamists have won a war of intimidation. They have cowed the major news media from showing these cartoons. The mainstream press has capitulated to the Islamists — their threats more than their sensibilities.
The SATs no longer have an analogy section, but perhaps our older readers will recognize:
Danish Cartoons:Radical Islamists as Geology Cartoons: ?
My mocking is more in disrespectful fun than actual sadness, much less fear, but censors come in all shapes and sizes. Yet they always start out small and harmless. Does Stand With Us believe that student/professors have the right to put whatever cartoons they like on their walls/doors? Someone ought to ask.
3) Think that an analogy between these two situations is crazy? Consider the behavior of some Stand With Us members during last week’s march.
Katie Stack ’08 was studying in Schow on Wednesday night, and, among other things, had a student aggressively call, “Stand with us,” in her face. “The way it was carried out, I wasn’t given an option,” Stack said. “If I didn’t stand up, to them it said I didn’t care about decreasing discrimination, which I thought it was unfair and polarizing.” She added that it was the most uncomfortable peer pressure she had felt at the College.
Nice. Think Stack is nuts? Consider:
Three first-years from Sage Hall were doing homework in their common room when the Stand With Us march passed through the Frosh Quad. They joined the march briefly, then attempted to return to their entry but were stopped by other marchers. “A few people were yelling at us – not in a malicious way, but making us feel guilty for going back in, like we were disrespecting them,” said Jack Killea ’11.
Well, as long as the yelling wasn’t “malicious,” no worries right? “Disrespecting” any member of Stand With Us will, one hopes, be against the forthcoming Social Honor Code.
The Record editorial board reports that:
In several instances those in the library that didn’t join in were yelled at and made to feel uncomfortable. Some who did not immediately stand with the rest of the group were intimidated into doing so.
The whole point about a “Pact Against Indifference” is that you are either with Stand With Us — yelling at students quietly studying, forcing first years to keep marching, defacing Geology Department cartoons — or you are not.
First they came for the geologists who love cartoons, but I was not a geologist, so I said nothing.
Stamp, Stamp, Stamp, the Boy’s are Marching!
Welcome, Eph Stamp-lovers to the exciting world of Philately! Yes “lickin’ and stickin” grows in popularity every year. So let’s just jumpr right in!
The metric system has evolved from the French (“metre”)units of 1790 to be officially recognized by the Eleventh General Conference on Weights and
Measures as the International System of Units (SI) in 1960. This note brings together brief biographical notes of the scientists for whom many SI units are named, along with reproductions of postage stamps from around the world that
have been issued to honor these men.
This old gentrified House!
Yes. this is a place for all Ephs to talk over those pesky problems that come up all to oftern as one is gentrifying that great inner-city buy!
Lets start with those pesky drains:
Plumbing problems normally become self-evident pretty quickly: drains clog up, faucets drip, broken pipes spray, and so forth. Most minor plumbing problems are relatively easy to fix if you understand the basics of how the systems work. Considering the fact that plumbers now cost over $80 per hour in many areas, you can save significantly by making your own repairs when possible.
Of course, some repairs are easier to do than others are. Many just take time; some are a major hassle–particularly those that involve working on pipes that are hidden behind walls or under floors, or are otherwise difficult to access.
It’s All about Cooking!
Welcome to the world of Eph-proven recipes. Your opportunity to exchange those treasured recipes handed down from generation to generation of food-loving families!
And here to start us out:
Madeleines!
1 1/2 sticks unsalted butter (6 ounces)
2 tablespoons softened unsalted butter (for greasing pan)
3/4 cups unbleached all-purpose flour
4 large eggs
a pinch fine-grain sea salt
2/3 cups sugar
zest of one large lemon
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
powdered sugar
a bit of extra flour for dusting baking pan
Special equipment: A madeleine baking pan, regular or small
Preheat oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit.
Melt the 1 1/2 sticks of butter in a small pot over medium heat until it’s brown and gives off a deliciously nutty aroma, roughly 20 minutes. Strain (using a paper towel over a mesh strainer) – you want to leave the solids behind. Cool the butter to room temperature. By doing the butter first you can complete the rest of the steps while it is cooling.
Bake the madeleines for 12 – 14 minutes (7-10 minutes for smaller cookies), or until the edges of the madeleines are golden brown. Remove from oven and unmold immediately. Cool on racks and dust with powdered sugar.
Makes 2 -3 dozen regular madeleines.
1988 Yearbook: Page 58
Click below for full image:
Read more
Eph Ambassador
The man on the right is an Eph ambassador. Can you name him?
1988 Yearbook: Page 57
Click below for full image:
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 56
Click below for full image:
Read more
Social Pressures
On our way to Dartmouth, the gender mix of the Williams trustees came up. Five of the 25 current trustees are women. (By the way, kudos to Williams for making public the terms of trustees. EphBlog gets results! But it would be even better if they listed which trustees were elected directly by the alumni. My recollection is that these are: Alvarez, Bowen, Christian, Lawrence, and Rogers. That only one of these is a white male is not, one presumes, a coincidence. Related posts here.)
Anyway, “current eph” wrote:
What percentage of ephs who could potentially be trustees are women? Trustees are–for the most part–above a certain age and have achieved a certain level of financial and social success. While women started attending Williams in the 70s, it took a number of years before Williams got even close to 50-50. Just looking at the total number of woman at “trustee age” compared to men at “trustee age,” it should be clear that there would be more male trustees. Furthermore, because of social pressures on women to give up their careers or partially give up their careers to become mothers, a significant percentage of “trustee aged” women will not be as far along on their careers as similarly aged men. Finally, sexism in the elite workplace is still in strong force, and for better or worse, this is the primary workplace from which trustees are drawn.
The first part of this comment is correct. Age matters. In a gender neutral world, there would be more male trustees than female trustees because Williams did not go co-ed until the late 60’s.
But I have real doubts about that “social pressures” stuff, perhaps because I know more Eph women with children than current eph does. The vast majority of Eph women do not choose children over career because of “social pressures.” They choose them because they love their children more than they love their careers. Call them crazy!
Now, if you’re a Marxists believer in false consciousness, then perhaps it is “social pressures” that make Eph women make those choices. Perhaps it is “social pressures” that made me put in blue jeans and blog today. But, as a first approximation, the best way to understand the choices people make is to ask them about those choices. Perhaps this attitude makes me more a sociologist than an economist, but I will leave that to Rory.
current eph is free to argue that these women are making bad choices, that, for example, my wife is an idiot to work part-time so that she can be class mom to our daughters, that it is nasty “society” which forces her to not work 60 hours a week like many of her (male) peers in dermatology, that she, and her female classmates from the glorious class of 1989 are only making the choices that they make because of social pressures. But Current Eph would be wise not to make this argument in their presence lest they mock him mercilessly.
Also, “sexism in the elite workplace” is 95% fantasy. I have been in elite workplaces for a decade and seen virtually none. First-hand counter-examples are welcome! More rant below.
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 55
Click below for full image:
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 54
Click below for full image:
Read more
Windmill History
Do any readers know the history of the College’s forays into renewable energy? Leave your thoughts in the comments. This article provides some background.
After trying for a couple of years to test a site in Petersburgh, Williams College in August 2004 canceled plans to erect electric-generating windmills near the scenic Petersburgh Pass four months after the town was critical of the proposal.
Alternative energy enthusiasts first aired their idea in the fall of 2002 for a wind farm on land the college owns on the elevated and windy pass on the Taconic Ridge. The towns of Berlin and Petersburgh at first mostly welcomed the idea and the college filed an application with the town Zoning Board to erect a test tower, a 168-foot-tall thin metal monopole with an anemometer — a wind speed and direction measuring device — near the top.
After that application was received, protests against the plan arose at town board meetings. Residents said the windmills, which could stand 330 feet tall to the tip of a vertical propeller blade, would be noisy and mar the scenery.
See also this amazing (pdf) on “Report on the Feasibility of a Wind Power Project on the Berlin Pass” by Collins Canada, Lindi von Mutius, Sarah Wu and Vivian Schoung. The report is undated, but seems to have been written in 2002. The more that students focus their energies on local projects, the more important that work will prove to be.
Report abstract below. (Pictured to the right is Zephyr, the windmill on Brodie Mountain.) Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 53
Click below for full image:
Read more
1988 Yearbook: Page 52
Click below for full image:
Read more
Subscribe
Williams Record- Campbell enjoys athletic and academic success
- Light humor makes Black Comedy a success
- Kain scores 1000th as men’s hoops wins two
- Walk on the wild side at Winter Carnival
- Women’s swim, dive improves to 6-0
- Men’s swim, dive dominates MIT field, routs Middlebury
- Women’s basketball falls just shy of upset bid at No. 3 Bowdoin
- Will it ever fade?
- Students a sight for sore eyes
- Women’s ice hockey looks strong
- College News Releases
- Maria Elena Cepeda's New Book Examines the "Boom" of Latina/O Music
- Williams College Opus Zero Band Selected to Perform at Band Directors Conference
- Geologist's Personal Revelations of "Heroic Engagement with the Earth" Published ...
- Williams College Nurses Travel to Haiti to Provide Relief to Earthquake Survivors
- Williams College Names Philosophy Professor William Dudley as Next Gaudino Scholar
- Athletics
- Ephs ride hot shooting to Elite 8, defeat SUNYIT 104-70
- #1 Amherst ends Ephs season in competitive game at LeFrak
- W-A-T-C-H the Ephs in NCAA M/W Hoops, M/W T & F and Men's Lax this weekend
- Eph Men Headed to Indiana for NCAA Indoor Track Championships
- Luthi top-15 in NCAA Ski Championships
- Williams in 12th with 6 races to go at NCAA Championships
- Ephs set to host NCAA Sectional this weekend
- Blake Schultz Wins Prestigious Jostens Trophy