Sat 1 Mar 2008
Rips in Fabric of Japanese Society
Often the media report that Japan since the 1990s has been going through its deepest economic recession in half a century, but little is said of the nation’s inward distress and violence as outcomes of Japan relinquishing its dominant economic position in the world.
And with the collapse in the belief of Japan as an economic miracle, scholars say young people feel the county has lost its way.
This picture of the “darker” side of Japanese society was the topic of discussion at the Woodrow Wilson Center on Feb. 20 when several Japan scholars described various aspects of a troubled and violent society.
The themes ranged from the link between organized crime and violence in the political order to the social deviancy of youth, low birth rate, high suicide rate, and “permanent” part-time employment. An example of extreme distress peculiar to Japanese society is the “hikikomori” phenomenon, whereby youth withdraw in their rooms, unwilling to venture out and hold a job or go to school or speak to friends and lead a normal life.
Eiko Maruko Siniawer, assistant professor of history at Williams College, described the origins of the Yakuza, the name of Japan’s organized crime, and how it became a violent arm of political parties with nationalistic sentiments.
Ms. Siniawer said that in the late 17th and 18th centuries, men running gambling dens formed mafia-style “families,” and powerful gang bosses emerged. Some dubious merchants, selling shoddy goods, had a similar need for protection in controlling areas. These two “criminal”-type businesses attracted violent men for protection and they evolved into “political ruffians.” In Japan these men became an integral part of the political scene, bringing violence onto their political opponents.
In pre-World War II Japan, the Yakuza would break up strikes and oppose Leftist parties and thought. Siniawer said the Yakuza’s violence contributed to the decline of political parties in the 1930s.
The Yakuza were reborn after the war and, until lately, retained their violent nature. This violent tendency began to recede in the 1960s and especially in the 1970s when the public became more intolerant of the violence of the past.
Despite being engaged in illegal activities, the Yakuza have become institutionalized in the practice of politics. Siniawer argues that for much of Japan’s modern history, political violence is so institutionalized and accepted that Japan can be characterized as a “violent democracy.”
Related post here.



March 2nd, 2008 at 2:50 pm
Violent Democracy is the pathology of organized psychopathic behavior within “Democratic” nations. Chief among these is the United States, Israel, Great Britain, Europe, Russia, Japan, India and China. The fact that their residents do not demand accountability of their present governments, the restoration of their “Rights” is testimony to their psychological complicity. Denial is no longer possible.
Without disclosures as to the crimes that have been committed against the people, and to masquerade as a Democracy, is to demonstrate the mental illness among the masses we now observe with our new political candidate and theis person’s simplistic jingoism. When a society is faced with controlled programming and an enemy which they cannot define, apathy, pessimism, messianism, hysteria, and unhealthy behaviors surface in the streets, the homes and their personal lives.
This agenda marches against all of mankind. It requires a global human initiative to oppose it for human survival. We need a global mantra of “Just Say NO” and boycott these dissolute systems.
All words used by these change agents are all lies free of truth. We need to create parallel empowerment, of finding and using, initiating and developing parallel, unconnected local and regional resources and systems to replace dysfunctional ones. We need authentic engagement.
Alfred North Whitehead said: “Civilizations can only be understood by those who are civilized.” Democracy requires an electorate that understands concepts and ideas of critical thinking, civic government, their “Rights versus Privileges”, and the essential elements of its economic, political and social structures.
Enlightened consciousness engages human civility, it practices moral self-discipline, it enables and empowers autonomous self-realization. Plato said: “The creation of the world is the victory of persuasion over force.” We must develop genuine feelings of compassion and regard for our fellow human beings. Our savagery over our neighbors by defining them as terrorists or waging “War on Terror” is a pre-cultural level of violence marked by a total absence of restraint and untamed barbarism.
Freedom is self-rule, the ability to rule oneself. When a culture ignores or destroys civil liberties, this is the beginning of decline. Gibbons in his famous history, The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire, outlined the major reasons for the fall of Rome:
1. Government was controlled by special interests
2. Militarism became state policy
3. Patriotism declined and people lost allegiance to the state
4. State imposed heavy taxes
5. Moral decay evidenced by excessive licentious behavior
6. Dependence upon foreign products
7. Labor force and work ethic declined
8. City infrastructure declined
9. Balance of trade deficit increased
10. Cost of government became burdensome
11. Class economic warfare between rich and poor
12. Empire taxes varied considerably
13. Traditional Roman character traits challenged by Christianity which concentrated on personal salvation neglecting the state, losing touch with themselves, their life, and becoming impotent to guide it
We must preserve our heritage and understand the enduring importance of higher knowledge and values. Our call to action demands the development of advanced powers of discernment and to safeguard and disseminate the wisdom that resonates with high culture and the simple things of the spirit.
Then of course, when Cupid speaks, EveryMan Listens.
March 2nd, 2008 at 3:35 pm
In my boyhood neighborhood if one was compassionate, forgiving or otherwise open in attitude too broadly too often, then eventually (and not infrequently) he was gulled, bullied, robbed, battered or worse. Consequently if one did not want to be forced from social intercourse, he learned as a matter of defense to be vigilant, be skeptical, posture, be shrewd, deceive, develope a physical or psychic hardness, run fast, punch hard.
March 2nd, 2008 at 3:51 pm
“Violent Democracy is the pathology of organized psychopathic behavior within “Democratic” nations. Chief among these is the United States, Israel, Great Britain, Europe, Russia, Japan, India and China.”
How could China possibly be considered a “Democratic” nation?
March 2nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm
And here I thought Europe was a continent…a violent one, no doubt, but not a nation.
March 2nd, 2008 at 5:48 pm
rory,
Nations? Where?
They seem to be dwindling somewhat rapidly, or at least, misplacing their constituent parts. (Kosobo je Cpbиja? The DF is paying taxes to the Federales these days? Who can keep up?)
Speaking of the potential violence that may lie through some open doors.
It amazes me that the Union is engaged earnest discussion and framing of its Constitution, of the meaning of dissolving its individual nation-states in order to form a new {…} “upon the earth…”
With narry a public notice from “the Americans.” In fact I can’t even find reasonable explanations of the European debates in English. It’s as if every professor and journalist in the US has stuck their head in the sand, decided their ‘job’ is 9-5 “research and teaching,” accumulating their rapidly deflating dollars, and politely ignored the 900-lbs gorilla that has entered the room.
But no, Europe’s nascent forms of government and political economics are not “a nation-state.” They are, often, framed as a rejection of nation-states. Among other things, such as the alternative to a certain purported “empire” run from another “continent.”
How long and how much “hegemony” that “empire” may have left is another questions, as is how long “we Europeans” will remain committed to ‘Zinderhaas’-style non-violence. Mark Rheinhardt reminds me that Germany once promised his grandfather that he could be German, too.
N.B. Seeing the writing on the wall, the present commentator has applied for citizenship in the future European Union based on the jus sanguinis of Padania, as somewhat recognized by the presumptively ‘former’ Republic of Italy.
March 2nd, 2008 at 10:32 pm
Democracy has many different meanings within different languages and their cultural context. As a concept, Democracy may not exist in Eastern societies because of the manner in which it relates to their cultural ideology and political philosophy.
With regards China, harmony and obedience is the primary ideology underlying the recognition of differences between individual and public interests. For China, democratic principles are authoritarian where the unity of state and the individual are one and the same.
Mao Zedong in 1919 called the May 4th Movement the “New Democratic Revolution” and the Chinese Communist Party. Mao’s “Great Democracy” claimed support for Chinese intellectual traditions along Confucian ideology.
Recently, the word “democracy” has been associated with the West. The strength and the wealth of the industrialized West have moved the Chinese with democratic aspirations for a patriotic nationalistic Chinese tradition of their own.
With regards Europe, I was referring to several Democratic States within the European continent.
The United States was formed as a Republic. Why do refer to a Republic as a Democracy?. The purpose of my citing was to demonstrate the elastic term of Democracy and the hypocrisy associated with governments who invoke the word without proper reference to its meaning for them.
Secondly, this thread was about violent democracy. Examine the nations cited and ask yourself are these democratic nations respectful of democratic traditions and governance?
March 3rd, 2008 at 12:35 am
“What we are seeing is the fall of the Roman Empire, only now it is the fall of America, the glory of our Empire. This war is what Parthya was to Rome.”
(–Harold Bloom, January 2007)
March 3rd, 2008 at 2:17 am
Ken,
The news today was on the dismal side, that is for sure.
Between the above post about Japan, Kosovo’s ‘dependent independence’, Gaza, the predicted future energy need in India, the bleak job market; the ‘mean’ economy, a newly named strain of Anorexia (drunkorexia), the elderly and ‘reverse mortgage’, and the tension in our own election, etc. etc. I felt by the end of the day, the best thing to do with the newspapers was to wad them up and start a nice big fire!
That said, we must all have heart. Tomorrow is another day. Maybe Dick can post something about the “Oregon Paradigm?”