You are the thief. Stay clear of my den, for I am the shepherd and the Ram. You are but an interloper, an intruder, a stranger, a bozo with a mission. With your mantra: “Yes We Can” and your logo: “Change We Can Believe In” is superfluous.

You may win the Primacy but not Supremacy.

Veni, Vidi, Vici.

Apologies as well.

You showed amazing moxie in posting again after the initial response to your “bubble’ post.

“Stick around” indeed…as it will pay off.

Anyway, I view this is a start – I think EphCOI idea makes a lot of sense and I look forward to those improvement you are implementing. I hope to stick around, too ;)

There is nothing offensive about your post. It is unfortunate that this medium does a terrible job of conveying tone (note to ken: put “textual transmission of facial modalities” on your to-do list), and I’m afraid you’ve misread some of the posts here. Welcome to the conversation.

Greeting, and welcome. I enjoyed both your posts and the questions they raised, but haven’t had a change to respond.

I assure you that some of us are thinking seriously about them, as well– but a little humour now and then can also be useful, no? In any case a “twitter” of responses is common here (not ‘SPAM’) and, for technical and other reasons I won’t go into, a blog tool of this nature is unlikely to produced sustained responses.

In any case, it also be my job to change all of that a bit in the next months, and I hope you’ll stick around as we do that. “Stay tuned.”

Williams depends on generous donations, and having few more wealthy Ephs would not hurt. Morty wants us to succeed ;)

With an N = 1, that might be a tough thesis to write . . .

I smell an econ thesis topic: Does running an alumni blog for five years have a positive or negative impact on fund manager alpha creation?