Wed 19 Mar 2008
Well-written article on global warming and the threat to regional winter activities.
Steve Sheppard, an economics professor at Williams College, said ski areas wouldn’t be the only casualties of a weakened winter-recreation season. Also compromised would be hotels, bed-and-breakfasts, restaurants and stores.
“It (would) have a significant impact on hospitality,” Sheppard said. (All) visitors spend a surprising amount of money in local shops.”
The scientists’ report also surmises that ski resorts in the northern part of the Northeast, which might initially gain business as southern competitors are forced to close, would eventually struggle under the burdens of a shortened season and higher costs.
Winter athletes contacted for this story said they’d done substantial reading on the subject.
But that’s all they agreed on.
Some, like the Dethier family in Williamstown, have rearranged their lives to help combat climate change.
Others, like Pittsfield ice fisherman Jim Lambert, base their views on cynicism and cyclisim.
Lambert is my kind of New England Yankee.
The Dethier family operates on the opposite end of the spectrum.
Evan Dethier, now a freshman cross-country skier at Williams College, did a documentary probing global warming and the difficulties it created for the ski team during his senior year at Mount Greylock Regional High School. The team held practices on roller-skis, cross-trained, and ran for much of the year. Races often were held at ski resorts because the traditional courses did not have snow.
The Nordic ski community relies mostly on natural snow, meaning both snowfall and avoiding significant melting play a role in the success of the season.
“The line is so close here,” Dethier said. “A lot of times it’s snowing at 29 or 30 degrees. In the relatively near future, it’ll be harder and harder to find places to cross-country ski in North America, particularly in the Northeast.”
Evan’s father, David, is a geosciences professor at Williams College. The family bought a Prius Hybrid five years ago in an effort to be environmentally conscious and has replaced its refrigerator with a more efficient version.
Replacing a refrigerator is nice, but did Dethier do anything to try and stop the College from emitting untold tons of carbon during all its recent construction? I doubt it. Even worse, no one has even bothered to report to the College community an accouting of the carbon emissions. No worries though! The North and South Academic Buildings are beautiful and all Dethier friends in Div I and II will soon have beautiful new, larger, air-conditioned offices.
Not that there is anything wrong with that, of course.
Print • Email| « Mapping Strategy | Basketball Recruiting » |
12 Responses to “Slippery Slope”
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post
If a comment you submitted does not show up, please email us at eph at ephblog dot com. Please note that commenters are required to use a valid email address when submitting comments.




frank uible says:
Less skiing means more baseball!
March 19th, 2008 at 12:46 pmPCE says:
Hmm. Two opinions diverge in a news article… and Kane takes the opinion less traveled.
Lambert might my kind of New England Yankee too, for such topics as what kind of shanty to buy, the best type of bait for a given (warmer?) lake, and how thick the ice must be before I walk out onto it. But climate change? I’m not surprised, but really? Call me crazy, but I think I’m going to go with the geosciences professor on this one (which also happens to be the essentially unanimously held opinion of scientists who work on this stuff.)
Or, if you really think I should go with the fisherman over the scientist, should I also buy pills “designed by a teacher“, not Pfizer, and move my investments from Mr. Schwab to this Ponzi dude?
<snark>”Just asking!”</snark> ;-)
March 19th, 2008 at 12:50 pmFROSH mom says:
Frank,
The energy usage in Williamstown must be waaay down right now.
It must be painfully quiet around there…
Any sign of spring?
March 19th, 2008 at 1:02 pmNeil says:
Pivot right:
Yes, his activism is hypocritical in its inaction.
March 19th, 2008 at 2:04 pmfrank uible says:
mom: Yes, if 38 degrees and a cold rain are springlike.
March 19th, 2008 at 3:00 pmAnon '89er says:
I have a cousin who captains yachts that summer in the Hamptons and winter in the Bahamas, and has fished up and down the eastern coastline for 30 years. He can give you quite specific information about how the different types of fish have moved northward with their climatic zones over that period of time.
But since he is a bit of a hippy, I guess this experience gets him a sneer.
March 19th, 2008 at 5:59 pmfrank uible says:
As “hard cases make bad law”, so do anecdotes tend to make bad policy.
March 19th, 2008 at 6:48 pmGuy Creese '75 says:
What’s a sloap?
March 19th, 2008 at 9:22 pmDavid says:
A spelling mistake, now corrected.
March 19th, 2008 at 10:00 pmJay says:
Dethier does actually walk the walk – I’m not sure why the article chose to mention the fridge as if that was the extent of his energy savings.
He lives in a tiny house, uses only CFLs (I believe), uses efficient radiant heating in the floors, natural sunlight, and takes all sorts of precautions to limit his family’s energy usage – far more than most families.
Also, the criticism of him not doing anything about emissions is unfair – he spends much of his time working on exactly those issues, including offering summer internships through the Luce foundation that allow students to investigate College energy practices. He was also involved and vocal in trying to ensure that the new construction would be done in an environmentally friendly manner, and also that the buildings themselves are highly efficient “green” buildings. He tried to push for LEED certification for the buildings, but that wasn’t successful. That the administration didn’t heed many of his concerns isn’t simply his failing.
March 20th, 2008 at 9:09 amLarry George says:
Thank you for that, Jay. I was suspecting that he was being unfairly criticized, but I don’t know him so I couldn’t challenge the accuser.
March 20th, 2008 at 11:06 amfrank uible says:
The biggest environmental problem is population. Either or both of two solutions are proposed: 1) reestablishment of the bubonic plague (the more quickly effective of the two); 2) universal sexual abstinence (in my boyhood neighborhood that solution being called “keeping it in your pants”). Oh, readers – in which one are you going to participate? Being 73 years old, my participation in either would amount to very little sacrifice.
March 20th, 2008 at 11:21 am