Sun 30 Mar 2008
Provost Bill Lenhart’s recent letter on changes in financial aid (hat tip to EphNotes) is a model of clarity. Read the whole thing but note this part:
Until two years ago there was no limit to the amount of home equity taken into account, though financial aid officers could use discretion to reduce it when doing so seemed to treat a family more fairly. This might be when a family long ago acquired a home in a market that has since boomed or when a family’s home equity is the only form of retirement savings.
Two years ago we set a limit on how much home equity would be considered at 2.4 times parent income, though aid officers still could make adjustments in circumstances that called for them. Last year we reduced this to 2 times parent income.
We’ve decided this spring to reduce it further to 1.2 times, with discretion to make adjustments when called for. This is the level suggested by financial aid directors at private colleges and universities that practice need-blind admissions, who meet to work toward a common understanding of how to measure financial need.
This change goes into effect in the coming academic year for students in all four classes. For returning students it will be reflected in the aid awards mailed this summer. This latest move will cost the College an estimated $800,000 and affect about 320 Williams families.
As Lenhart hints, almost all of this is driven, not by Morty and the Trustees suddenly realizing that rich families need a break, but by competition from other schools. Williams wants the students who it accepts to choose it and not some other school. Since those schools are lowering prices for the best students, Williams has no choice but to follow. Isn’t competition cool?
I suspect that the phrase “financial aid directors at private colleges and universities that practice need-blind admissions” is an oblique reference to our friends in the 568 group. Classic post here.
The Record really ought to do a story on financial aid at Williams, specifically how many “adjustments” are made and for whom? If you call up the Financial Aid Office in April and claim that your “circumstances” are special, what happens? Does Paul Boyer just say, “No problem! Your expected family contribution is cut in half.” Does he want to know if you have been accepted to other schools? Does he ask you to send him the details of their offers? I have heard that some bargaining and/or offer-matching goes on, but the Record ought to tell us some stories.
EphBlog’s Advice: If you want to go to Williams and you are either very poor or very rich, then apply early decision. Your financial aid package is highly unlikely to be affected by whether or not you are accepted at other schools. If you are in the great “middle class” — roughly family income of $60,000 to $250,000 — and you want to minimize your college costs, then apply regular decision to many schools. Your odds of getting in to Williams are probably a little lower (unless you have a hook) and your leverage in negotiating some “adjustments” is much higher.
Do any readers have experience with negotiating with the Financial Aid Office at Williams? Tell us your stories.


March 30th, 2008 at 8:07 am
The Overlap Group continues to exist - just without its former sobriquet. And of course consequently Williams and its institutional peers also continue arrogantly and openly to flout the Sherman Act. Their conspiratorial arrangement on the weighting of applicants’ home equity has the obvious purpose and effect of illegally suppressing actual and potential competition among them relative to product pricing. Upon the Apocalypse they are going to get their collective tits caught in the antitrust ringer. If the members of Big Oil did something like this, their executives would go to jail, inter alia.
March 30th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
frank: I have never heard of governments intervening for antitrust reasons when a group of private organizations reduce their prices (except maybe in France); in fact, this process is commonly known as competition, not collusion.
March 30th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
It is classic price fixing and criminal.
March 30th, 2008 at 10:58 pm
When I got my financial aid offer, my parents called the financial aid to see if it could be improved at all. They responded by offering me an extra $1000/yr in grants, which seems to have disappeared after the first year. So it would appear that, at least two years ago, Williams wasn’t particularly interested in bending over backwards to compete with other schools on affordability.
March 31st, 2008 at 1:28 pm
It’d be interesting to see also how after one matriculates and spends a year here whether the financial aid office is less willing to grant him extra money if say a sophomore applies for new aid.
For example, I am a sophomore currently who probably just missed financial aid. However, I was promised some money or at least a much greater chance at financial help when my sister, now a senior in HS, attended college (by the fact that now my parents are paying for two college educations). I wonder, though, whether Williams will look at me and say, hey — he’s here, he doesn’t really have any other offers, and it’s very unlikely he’s going anywhere, let’s keep him off of aid and save the money.
March 31st, 2008 at 11:22 pm
First ‘10: Did your parents ask about the $1000 when it wasn’t there the second year?