Tue 3 Jun 2008
The College has published the speeches from graduation. Good stuff! Kudos to whoever is behind this effort, especially the care taken with maintaining an archive of past speeches. Future historian should note, alas, that not all speeches were presented as they are listed there (or so reports my summer intern who helped to rewrite the end of his brother’s speech). The Eagle and iBershires provided coverage.
Were any readers at the festivities? Comments welcome.
Peter Nunns ‘08 reports:
I want to say more - about the student speeches (one smarmy bullshit, one well-meaning banality, and one that was well-thought-out), or about the speech by sculptor Richard Serra (it was the sort of flinty realism one would expect from someone who works with huge bits of steel - “If it’s not broken, break it!”), or about the sweet-ass robes worn by the professors (they motivated me to apply to graduate school). But I’m tired.
Don’t go to graduate school unless you are certain you know what you are getting into. See advice from Derek Catsam ‘93 and Swarthmore Professor Tim Burke.
Sam Crane enjoyed Richard Sera’s speech.
We had our graduation here at Williams College yesterday and all the ceremonies went well. The threatened rain never materialized and all the graduates were duly recognized. The invited speaker was sculptor Richard Serra, the man who is famous for his giant manipulations of sheets of rolled steel. I went to his retrospective at the MoMA last year and was quite impressed. I had seen pictures of his big steel works before, but I had never had the chance to get close to them, to walk through them, to take them in physically. If “awesome” were not so overused, it would be a good description.
Serra’s commencement speech was memorable - the more I think about it, the more I like it. I’m sure I will remember it. Most striking was the line I have take for the title of this post?: “If it ain’t broke - break it.” This was his main theme, of sorts. He exhorted the graduates to follow their own instincts and desires and obsessions wherever they might lead; to not allow conventions and social expectations and the advice of others to distract them from their own personal life’s paths.
The style of the presentation matched his intention. He did not embed his ideas in personal anecdote. Indeed, he warded the assembled multitude away from metaphor. He stood as a beacon of pure abstraction, just like his sculptures. I’m sure many did not like the speech all that much because it did not have the nice, story-telling quality of so many graduation day presentations. And I am also sure that Serra was aware that many would not like it. But he did not let that stop him; he did not allow the ideal of the “graduation speech” to get in the was of what he wanted to say. The abstraction of his words matched the passion of his message: follow your heart; don’t listen to others who tell you that you can’t or shouldn’t do what you can see and feel you must do. If the “rules” are telling you that you can’t (and by this he means social and cultural expectations, not literally the law), break them.
Hmmm. Is that really good advice? The great problem with advice from Commencement speakers is selection bias. Assume that there are 100 artists who, 50 years ago, were following this advice. One of them, at least, is Richard Serra. Good for him! But what happened to the other 99? Was following “their own instincts and desires and obsessions wherever they might lead” really the best strategy for them? Tough to know since none of them will ever speak at a Williams Commencement.
Best line: “Now, men, telling a woman she’s beautiful is always a good idea … no matter the question she asked.” So true! That’s from Class Speaker Gordon Phillips ‘08. My own version is: “You can never buy your Eph lady friend too many flowers.” What advice do our readers have for the graduates?
26 Responses to “ Desires and Obsessions ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Keeping It Real » EphBlog
June 10th, 2008 at 6:57 am[...] Serra, Commencement Address, “If Not Now, When?” See our previous discussion of Serra’s speech. I am surprised that no one noticed the obvious: His speech was a parody. [...]


June 3rd, 2008 at 11:14 am
Upon being told that the Williams commenceement speaker was to be Serra, one of my sons, who not surprisingly is more engaged in the here and now than I, informed me that a Serra sculpting located in a St. Louis public park and appearing as a complex of giant steel plate fences has been frequently used by local drunks as a pissoir. Is the pissing part of the art? If it is, several possible metaphors readily leap to mind.
June 3rd, 2008 at 11:21 am
Thanks for posting the speeches. Erika’s is sweet, and Serra’s is a big improvement on last year’s commencement speech.
June 3rd, 2008 at 11:25 am
Also…why does it matter what happened with the hypothetical other 99? I have never met anyone who said, “Gee, I wish I hadn’t followed my dreams and obsessions. What a waste! I should’ve just gotten a job to pay the bills.” Even if they did end up in a job to pay the bills, rather than a dream career, who regrets trying?
June 3rd, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Wait, what happened to LaVar Burton? Glad to see Lipp step up to the plate — but did I miss the post explaining the last minute switch? Any details?
June 3rd, 2008 at 12:58 pm
I don’t remember the exact details but he was offered an opportunity that he didn’t think he could turn down, so he reluctantly notified the College (about a month ago?) and Lipp was kind enough to step in. I hope Burton will make a speaking appearance at Williams in the near future.
June 3rd, 2008 at 1:49 pm
What an interesting array of speeches, all words of wisdom.
From Thomas’s advice to “keep learning”, to Williams’ acknowledgement of those who supply the tools that help to “cut your own way”, to Phillips’ universal “find the beauty in everything and everyone” to Lipp’s practical steps to “making a life” and finally to Serra’s fascinating abstraction.
IMO, Serra’s message really complimented all the others by illustrating the importance of living life artistically, recognizing the uniqueness of what you have to offer and breaking the rules, if necessary, to accomplish it. This is after all, a guy who bends steel, beautifully and gracefully!
He did have some gentle admonishments about the dangers of spending too much time in “virtual reality”. Some of his final words were: “Keep it real, keep it in the moment.”[...]
That said, off I go to (ahem) try and bend some steel. :-)
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Oh and David:
In regards to your “selection bias” comment?
For every Serra who advises others to “follow their instincts” there are at least 99 others, like you, who are “advising against” it.
I say, thank goodness for passion, and for the Serras of the world who encourage and support that passion, otherwise we would have no art.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Thanks for posting the links, dkane.
It’s fun to read the speeches from various colleges.
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:22 pm
I was quite taken by Serra’s speech, and am pleased to learn from Prof. Crane’s comments, as quoted above from his blog, that it succeeded live as well as on paper. I had read the speech, pausing to rethink and reread parts, so I wasn’t sure how it would have come across in person. I found the address powerful: elemental and self-assured, yet completely humble.
Serra was genuinely glad to be honored by Williams, and made that quite clear when he started out by invoking by name members of the Williams Art Mafia who have had important impacts on him over the years. His respect for the current graduates impressed me. I like to think he was imagining a young Varnedoe or Lowry or Govan sitting out there, and was speaking to him or her; his words conveyed intimacy, sincerity and a personalized feeling, without sentimentality or stickiness, that were consistent with that type of targeted and focused thought. His respect for the ability of the audience to follow a complex address, his respect for the institution, and his respect for the graduates all added enormously to the flavor of the speech for me.
I was especially impressed by his insights about graduation speakers, and his refusal to follow the template:
I had read the baccalaureate speech given by Trustee Lipp ’60 immediately before reading Serra’s effort, and poor Lipp suffered extremely by comparison when read in such close juxtaposition. Yet, I think that Lipp may well have delighted in Serra’s speech, as Serra in many ways illustrated Lipp’s advice and echoed it, to a surprising extent, although almost in a different metaphorical dialect.
Williams took a risk in inviting Serra, and Serra took a risk in his approach and words. Kudos. I wish I could have been there. I hope that Williams videoed the address and will podcast it.
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Opps. I misformatted the quote above, and it was left out.
Serra said:
“When I look out at this graduating class, it is obvious to me that a generational gap exists between us which does not allow for an easy transfer of experience. I also realize that advice is hard to give, but nevertheless I will venture forth with a few tips, a few suggestions. I wanted this address to be about you and not about me; therefore, I decided to preclude a personal narrative. I am well aware that most commencement speakers present themselves as models by reflecting upon their achievements, but for me it would be disingenuous to weave my autobiography in and out of this talk. I don’t believe you will learn much from personal anecdotes. Nonetheless, the advice I will offer is the result of my life’s experience.”
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:40 pm
It seems to me that Serra’s speech was meant more for the Div I majors in the audience, and not so much for the budding financiers. Artists these days, especially young artists, need statements, or at least ideas, of purpose more than anything. I thought it was brilliant, and provided an eloquent and rarely-heard exposition - of ways for young artists to do good work, as well as of Serra’s personal artistic values. It was a complete 180 from last year’s speech, which was basically Katie Couric talking nonsense about herself for half an hour.
June 3rd, 2008 at 6:47 pm
I think we have to cut Lipp some slack. He was a last minute fill-in.
I thought his advice was excellent, but his speech was so predicated on assumptions about students and career paths(”get out on the factory floor!” and “smart people can work for NGOs”) as to be almost embarrassingly quaint and anachronistic.
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:00 pm
My advice to graduates would be to NOT answer any question from a woman with “you’re beautiful.” Unless of course you want to reduce the woman to a shallow, easily placated child who can’t see through such a flimsy distraction. But hey, that’s just me.
(Unless of course the question is “how do I look?”)
Yes, I realize he didn’t mean it like that, but I also don’t see why - of all of the valuable stuff in the speech - that is the line that was highlighted here as the “best.” Not meant to be offensive or provocative most likely, but it really is rather patronizing. I was enjoying the post, and Prof. Crane’s comments in particular, until that line at the end.
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 pm
to echo JG, you can see how badly going with the “you’re beautiful” line went in Doc Rivers’ recent embarrassing in-game interview with Michelle Tafoya, who handled it with amazing class (similar to Suzy Kolber with a drunk Joe Namahth). I can’t find video of that episode, but here’s Phil Jackson doing the same thing (video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvuSKaWP5Z8)
June 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Oh, I don’t know, JG…there are some gentlemen who can get away with that line…but only if they can carry a tune. Is this guy adorable or what?
While I’m here, really, really, no offense intended, but I need to know…am I the only one amused by hwc using the word “anachronistic” to describe someone else’s outlook? ;-)
June 3rd, 2008 at 11:27 pm
The line works if it is both given and also received as a small, light hearted, ironic joke.
June 4th, 2008 at 7:57 am
Thank you, JG. That line irritated me and took a lot away from the post.
To those of you going to reunions; have fun; write “home” and let us know how it goes.
June 4th, 2008 at 11:31 am
Just walked through the giant Serra installations at Guggenheim Bilbao in May. Breathtaking both for the creation of a constantly changing inner space and the relationship of the varying edge lines formed by the pieces to the internal structure of that wing of Gehrey’s masterful building. Pictures taken with my 1946 Brownie Reflex may turn out if I can find a place to process 620 film.
Swart was impressed as well when I was able to drag him away from his third tinto frio at lunch. And he enjoyed Erno Goldfinger’s towers in London. Said Goldfinger was a direct channeling of the Tuders. Whatever that means.
June 4th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Erno Goldfinger never channeled Tudor. Goldfinger did not appreciate Tudor building with their half-timbering, herringbone brickwork and leaded windows that was popularized in the Neo-Tudor designs of his day. Erno’s modern concepts exhibited an appreciation of the aesthetic potential of concrete and rectilinear designs found in Cubist designs. He departed from traditional English architecture. To quote: “The economics of buildings for whomever they are carried out is the ratio of enclosed space to useable space.” His sympathies were clearly Georgian.
June 4th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
Two of my advice “nuggets” are:
The three keys to success are truth, responsibility, and perseverance. [I was taught this in 5th grade and it's never steered me wrong.]
A quote from Simon Templar (yes, The Saint). “All my life I have told the truth. It is a great advantage, because then nobody ever takes you seriously.”
I liked the point/counterpoint of Bob Lipp’s and Richard Serra’s speeches. Two different storytelling approaches and viewpoints, but both insightful.
June 4th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Woke Swart from stupor to read him Broadband remarks.
After his pathetic whining for just one more Bell’s ‘afore ye go’, he admits that channeling was probably ill-attributed but he hears so many voices that it is difficult for him to keep them sorted.
After reconsideration, sez Balfron and Trelick call to him from some old Norman and uses as reference the poured concrete play areas as being quite reminiscent of the outlines of the battlements of the Tower of London, the vertical heating towers with their pierced slots directly pulled from archers points, and the general feel of ‘brutalist’ for which these towers were roundly criticized as part and parcel of the history of the City of London.
Also mumbles about how different from #2 Willow.
As for me, I would like to recommend ‘The Puritan Gift - Triumph, Collapse and Revival of an American Dream’ by Kenneth Hopper and William Hopper, I. B. Tauris & Co, Ltd, 2007 to any one interested in a view of American management roots and accomplishments. Caution - may contain politically incorrect material!
June 4th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
Mr. Turgidley,
I am pleased to have the honor of welcoming you and Mr. Swart home from your cultural explorations abroad…”ill attributed channeling” notwithstanding.
I think I speak for all, by…ahem…confessing… that you have been sorely missed.
Would it be too much to hope for, indeed to (humbly) expect, a ‘posting’ within which all the pleasures of said adventure could be outlined in detail?
Please consider this request (from those of us who have been left behind to ‘man the fort’…or..um… ‘pond’)…of course, allowing the time necessary for the “stupor” of jet lag to subside.
June 6th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Dear Froshmom,
Thank you for asking about the recent cultural adventure.
In spite of Swart’s lack of interest in the workshop on stamp perforations which started our tour, we were quickly immersed in art, music, theater, architecture, and that debatable Swart strength: becoming one with the street scene
This ability includes, but is not limited to, dancing in large circles with strangers, marching and singing in obscure fishermanic celebrations while drinking red wine, and drinking as many pints as you can with the lads at the local while watching Portsmouth beat Cardiff for the FA Cup! ‘Play up, Pompey’ sung many times to the tune of the Westminister chimes.
And this in the company of a former naval person whose medical credentials should have precluded this.
I have mentioned the Guggenheim Bilbao and Serra above. Also
Goldfinger (we did see the Ian Fleming show, but found it more a collection of publishing and movie ephemera rather than a look at a particularly spectacular life (v the Lawrence show at the same venue previously).
Gaudi seemed more revealed to me in his love of the uses of material for naturalistic and flowing forms in the Garden collonades as a direct comparison to his architectural work. And rather than marching to a different drummer, I see him as a stylistic off-shoot variant of Art Moderne/Art Nouveau (but not Jugenstihl)
The Shakespeare histories were being presented at the Round House to great acclaim and resounding power of sets. Lear was opening at the Globe to generally good reviews. I enjoyed this Lear for his more-abundant good humor, all-the-more to add to the collapse. And The 39 Steps will transfer to B-way. See this! A tremendous take-off on the Hitchcock with scenes matched shot-for-shot, but using only 4 actors. We saw it in the same theater where the Complete Works (abridged) had been staged and the parallels of minimal staging, great physical versatility and stamina of the actors, and the importance of timing in humor were not unnoticed. Swart is, needless to add, an old AMT Flit.
Musical highlights had to be ENO’s Merry Widow (sent in a quick shot on this sometime back in May) and the next-to-last performance in London by the Alban Berg Quartet.
A visit to Jay (’56) and Susanna Wilson in Oxford was a great exchange of war stories and a chance to have Jay play and sing a series of poems (Yeats, Rilke etc) he had set as songs. He also read his own poetry. A lovely set of days. Jay is still a once-a-week Anglican priest, taking the early mass at St Mary’s Oxford.
I won’t go into detail on the pints, cafe curtados, tinto frios, or Rob Roys downed. Or the strange assortment of things from the sea ingested. Just say, ‘awash’ is a good descriptor.
A final note: baseball. I joined Swart en famille on a large field beside the Wormwood Scrubs Prison where on weekends 500 kids
play organized baseball. In uniforms sponsored by Barclay’s. The Swart grand kids, 10 and 6, were playing and it recalled that the Big Game was to be played in Pittsfield.
I hope this gives you, FM, some feel of the periginations of old guys.
Swart is still forbidden from posting. But I may chime in from time to time when the subjects stray from what to me are the preoccupations of those unfortunate enough to wish to always remain an undergraduate.
Sincerely,
Rechtal Turgidley, Jr
June 6th, 2008 at 1:54 pm
“the preoccupations of those unfortunate enough to wish to always remain an undergraduate”
homerun
June 6th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Rech (if I may),
Sounds like a great trip. Outrageously expensive these days, nay? I am considering South America in lieu of Europe…
Say…I am wondering if your pal, Dick (being a lover of Shakespeare), has read any of Walter Kaufmann’s musings on the man. Kaufmann was an Eph and his writing came recommended to me by K. Thomas. I haven’t tackled the whole book, but what I have managed, I’ve enjoyed. Doubtless, Swart knows of it already.
Thanks so much for sharing your grand adventure, and a big (cyber) hug to D.S.
All best,
FM (soon to be SM… er… SOPH mom)