Fri 27 Jun 2008
In my regular truckload of political news yesterday and today, I noticed a little gem about Williams’ regular contributor and building namesake Edgar Bronfman, Sr. (of Seagram’s fame). Well, technically I think the building is named after the whole Bronfman family, many of whom contributed to the building, but still…Edgar was the initial Williams connection so far as I know.
Former World Jewish Congress President Edgar Bronfman headlines a group of prominent Jewish leaders from New York who are signing on to support the Barack Obama campaign.
The Obama Jewish Leadership Council of Metro New York plans to meet next Tuesday. Other participants include Merryl Tisch, Howard Milstein, Penny Pritzker, Tom and Andi Bernstein and New York Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Steve Israel.
(Another piece from Politico on the same fundraiser) There are some very interesting names on that list, but Bronfman obviously stood out. I am still impressed that he and the family donated for a building - and later many other things - when he didn’t actually graduate from Williams (would have been class of ‘50, got his bachelor’s from McGill in ‘51). We gave him an honorary degree in 1986 though, and a Bicentennial Medal in 2005. Funny, the honorary degree isn’t indicated in his entry in the online Alumni Directory. The announcement re: the Medal also is cagey about his graduating or not, saying only that he was “a member of the class of 1950″ but the other entries state “after graduation from Williams in 19XX.” Subsequent to the family giving $1.25 million of the $3.9 million needed for the building (bit of history here with fabulous ’60s pictures), several other members of the Bronfman family also went to Williams (Samuel II ‘75 and Matthew ‘81 - sons of Edgar, and Stephen ‘86 - nephew of Edgar, son of Charles who actually spearheaded the family fundraising for the building). There is also a Fiona Wood ’81 that comes up when you search the directory…hard to track all the family members so I assume she fits in there somehow. Google can only give you so much info. Bronfman also gave $5 million in 2003 for scholarships “to help extend need-blind admission to all international applicants” which should make David proud. He also gave money toward the building of the Jewish Religious Center.
I wonder if this means that Obama will get an ugly, overly concrete building for his campaign HQ now? I know there are those out there who sing the praise of strange ’60s and ’70s concrete & brick architecture like that of Bronfman (seen around campus in Greylock, Sawyer library, Prospect), but I have always found the interiors of such buildings cold, the sound quality terrible, and the weird odor from the concrete during warm humid days somewhat disconcerting.
Let me be clear that I fully applaud the ideals of a unified science center, and I appreciate how much space it provides. It allowed advances in science at Williams in a very real way (read the above link with the fun pictures). But starting out as a math major and spending much of my first two years in there and also spending many long nights there in my later years as a tutor with the Math/Science Resource Center, I grew to detest its cramped classrooms, often dim interior, and weird echoes. Perhaps I am alone in thinking this…and at least it doesn’t have the bizarre waffle ceilings like Greylock, but it’s not my favorite bit of Williams. I personally think it’s one of the examples of technically “great architecture” without thinking about people enjoying of the use of the building. I’m sure those who disagree with me will freely comment below. My opinion may also be biased by spending much time of late in the large number of similarly styled government buildings in and around DC. It just seems weird to me that if you accidently brush a wall on the INSIDE of a building, you could skin your knuckles.
I should point out that the Jewish Religious Center is a truly gorgeous building - inside and out - that is functional, filled with light, and beautiful. So I guess Bronfman’s involvement doesn’t actually require an ugly building…this just gave me a fun hook to tie a few different comments about Williams together ;)
Anyhow, viva la generous rich alums! I’m sure this bit of fundraising will lead to all kinds of interesting commentary in the MSM, especially with some of these folks’ former support of Clinton and the fact that Bernstein is a former classmate and supporter of George W. Too bad most bios of Bronfman don’t mention Williams at all…maybe some will now link to this little item?
June 27th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Hmmm…this is a difficult post to comment on without offending someone. I’ll leave my say and then skedaddle back to work (chicken that I am).
Really good news to hear of the Jewish support for Obama. I needed that after seeing today’s headlines re the Supreme Ct ruling on gun laws. This administration! Talk about one step forward, two steps backwards…nay…more like no steps forward, a thousand steps backwards…
And the 60’s in Architecture…again…a few steps backwards. Interesting tidbit, JG, about the knuckle-scraping. Never thought about it, but you are so right as to that being a characteristic of that era. At least the 60’s buildings on the W campus had the advantage of a healthy budget. Cheap construction is never a good thing, of course, but it is particularly unforgiving in that mode. I suppose Mission isn’t so bad…if they could just do something about the drapes that hang all askew. A different window treatment would go a very long ways towards improving the appearance of that building.
Regarding the Bronfmans…you certainly did your research. I had no idea he wasn’t a grad.
June 27th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
A little bit of looking a gift horse in the mouth.
June 28th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Okay, I finally have a moment to explore this post. It is a treasure trove! Honestly, JG, where did you find this stuff? The section about the 60’s is priceless. The photos are ‘central casting’ science geeks…um, I mean…students.
One tiny little excerpt from that link:
Part 5-”Turning Point for Science at Williams”
has this astounding headliner:
“Williams Enters the Computer Age”
with this very exciting news…
“In 1967, acquisitions of an IBM 1130 computer, a general purpose scientific electronic digital computer, had widespread curricular influence…”
my gosh, if they had any idea…
“…in the natural and social sciences Departments including Chemistry, Biology, Economics, Geology, Mathematics, Political Science, and Psychology offered at least one course that used the computer.”
Wow, “at least one course”!
Okay, I would like to hear more about this computer from one of our tech experts. How big and cumbersome would it have been?
And what were it’s capabilities compared to our computers now?
Great bit of archival work here, JG!
June 28th, 2008 at 6:29 am
I’m far from being a tech expert, but I recall that during the late 60s the prime computer of a Fortune 500 industrial company, with which I was then familiar, filled a reasonably large room - of course, the room had to be continually air conditioned in order to assure the computer’s performance. I’m not sophisticated enough to make a comparison of that computer’s capabilities to common capabilities of today - except that by today’s standards it was excruciatingly slow.
June 28th, 2008 at 9:28 am
And then there were punch cards…
June 28th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Are the Bronfmans no longer Canadian?
June 28th, 2008 at 11:18 am
Larry - Edgar Sr. became a citizen in 1959.
June 28th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
That explains the open involvement in the U.S. election. Thanks, JG.