Thu 20 Nov 2008
A recent story here about flag background is about a row over a doctored photo of the Army’s first four star woman general in which an American flag was substituted for a desk and bookcase. The Associated Press says “that adjusting photos and other imagery, even for aesthetic reasons, damages the credibility of the information distributed by the military to news organisations and the public”.
Well, I thought I would put this thesis to the test using a figure selected at random from Williams history.
Perhaps some of you familiar with his identity can comment on any changes of perception of him because of the changing background.



November 20th, 2008 at 7:26 am
Yes,to a not insignificant extent.
November 20th, 2008 at 11:17 am
No, not censorship imo.
If the manipulation is to conceal, then it’s deception; if it’s done to control freedom of expression, then censorship; if it is done to portray particular characteristics of the subject, not naturally occurring in the undoctored photos, then it’s propaganda.
I think the AP wants a clear line drawn so it doesn’t have to examine the authenticity of every image it receives from the armed services.