Sat 9 May 2009
Pay for Sex
Posted by David under Wendy Shalit '97 at 6:08 am
Wendy Shalit ‘97 argues that it is wrong to pay for sex.
Hat tip to Marginal Revolution. I did not watch the whole debate, but Shalit’s speech was well done.
I think that the answer to these sorts of conflicts (prostitution, abortion, drugs, euthanasia, et cetera) is fairly simple: federalism. If the good people in Nevada want to legalize prostitution, then more power to them. That’s their business. As long as they don’t tell me and my fellow Massachusettians how to run our state, it is none of my business what they legalize and forbid in Nevada.
Print • Email| « NESCAC Baseball Thread | Equity and Access » |
9 Responses to “Pay for Sex”
Leave a Reply
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post
If a comment you submitted does not show up, please email us at eph at ephblog dot com. Please note that commenters are required to use a valid email address when submitting comments.
Ronit says:
Federalism is a cop out
Vermando '05 says:
What about in Vermont and New York? Our internal borders are open, so if they sold cocaine in boutiques in Vermont and allowed call-girl services with minors in New York, we might find that the morality of our valley would begin to decay a bit.
sophmom says:
Okay… IMO, her speech isn’t bad, but her delivery distracts. She needs to focus more on the gist of what she is saying, and less on trying to entertain. Some of her most powerful words were just…forfeited.
If you don’t believe me, try reading a transcript of the speech and see if you aren’t more affected by her words.
kthomas says:
In Kentucky at least, a debate coach’s technique, especially while judging, would be to look at the wall while focusing ‘the ear’ on the voice, the diction and intonation, choice of words, and the message– glancing occasionally.
It is a useful technique to apply here.
If Henry passes by, he may have some commentary.
PTC says:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu5gv9A2zc0&feature=related
Henry Bass '57 says:
kthomas,
The most important thing for a public speaker to learn is to make eye contact with his audience. A really good public speaker learns how to read his/her audience. To make sure everyone in the room is listening. 80% is not good enuf. You should not be putting anyone in the room to sleep. If you are you have to adjust. To change gears you may have to stop and ask a question. If you have to, find out why you are losing folks.
As a speech judge I would want to know how well the speaker is maintaining his audience’s attention. And this you have to observe by looking at the audience and looking to see if the speaker is aware of his/her audience and making adjustments when he/she has to.
I recently went to a lecture by Farish Jenkins, the great Harvard evolutionary biologists, who discovered the missing link betwee fins and legs when fish became amphibians in the evolutionary chain in a field trip near the North Pole. At the end of the lecture Jenkins thanked the audience for its attentiveness. “I could see that I did not lose anyone for the entire lecture.Everyone really paid attention.” What he did not say was that he had maintained eye contact with every one in the room, maybe 50 people, for the entire hour and was aware that he was holding every last one of them’s attention. When you get to the point in public speaking that you can do that you know that you have mastered the art. Every really good public speaker knows this.
Jenkins was the fellow who more than anyone brought Larry Summers down. He was well respected as a nonidealogical scientist. His polite but relentless cross examination of Summers at faculty meetings finally conviced the faculty to vote no confidence.
A terrific fellow and a terrific speaker. One of the best I have ever heard.
Ken Thomas '93 says:
There is a song, by a small Ukrainian band, that was sung a few years ago.
As the vocalist explained it to me, the narrative went something this–
he begins, speaking of the young women, coming to Kiev from the countryside to begin their lives, of nights in Kiev– of their natural beauty–
he leaves his country, and returns to Kiev from time to time–
as the young women, it seems to him, dwindle–
finally, he visits again, and there are none.
Where have the young women of my country gone?
Then, at the end of the song, he visits Dubai.
kthomas says:
A few years ago now, I walked into the office of the County Attorney on a matter of probate. His son, as a freshman, had followed this senior around in rather puppy-dog fashion; his daughter sat next to me in Chemistry and needed a lot of help if she was going to get into Brown.
His secretary was the mother of a woman who graduated a year below me– we sat down and talked for a number of minutes. I commented that things were a little simpler when I was going up– I was referring to the amount of drug use and production.
“Well, we had our fun.” She was referring to drugs and parties in the 70s– an interesting comment, given the office.
There was a major, and quite public case of child sexual abuse in the media, and we turned to the topic. “We don’t have enough resources to keep up; it’s a quarter of our caseload. Where do these people come from?”
Egads.
Well– what did she think things were like when I and her daughter were growing up? Had she– could she possibly– have managed to make herself unaware? Did she possibly think it was worse, now?
Did she think this had just started, out of thin air?
Federalism?
PTC says:
Ken- Ha! And all those wealthy Saudi women, in the latest western fashion and crashing Mercedes sports cars because they are not allowed to drive or dress in their country of origin… while the men prowl for the Eastern block and Asian “bad girls” you mention. Not a chance in hell for an infidel like you!
Wendi could really use a little time travel back to the “puritan” days that she so fondly flouts as chivalrous… back when the rule of thumb ruled the land.
Screw that!
The only answer to Wendi and her ilk is rock and roll… thank god for modern America. Elvis baby, ELVIS!